76 User sind betrachten gerade diesen Eintrag (on den letzten 30 Minuten)
0 Mitgleider, 76 Gäste
0 Mitgleider, 76 Gäste
What's popular right now:
Word Association (78 users)
1.6 reward campaing (63 users)
CBA PathBlood 1.8.0 (61 users)
AoKTS updates (55 users)
Photos of Voobly Players (28 users)
New CBA Hero now supports HD / D... (20 users)
Forgotten Empires 2.2 for Age of... (19 users)
Most active threads in past week:
1.6 not working with me anymore... (9 posts)
Setting up port forwarding in ro... (9 posts)
Error al lanzar la partida (5 posts)
Even another player faced a prob... (4 posts)
i can't play in new player (3 posts)
1.6 EASY SYNC ERROR (3 posts)
Idle TC and quick classical vs E... (3 posts)
circumstantial -> tardiness
Dependent was the most recent participant word.
Singular
(A matrix is singular iff its rows/columns are linearly dependent)
Obviously you're correct in that something circumstantial is dependent on different things but that's step three. Something needs to be circumstantial before we can say the word dependent. I thought about this before I wrote that. I should've wrote directly related above.
Obviously you're correct in that something circumstantial is dependent on different things but that's step three. Something needs to be circumstantial before we can say the word dependent. I thought about this before I wrote that. I should've wrote directly related above.
I already stated above that something that's circumstantial is dependent but this is after the fact. First, imo, something that is circumstantial needs to be specified in order for the word dependent to be put into play. And you can't say the word dependent at any time... not if it's been said recently per the rules you made in the original post. I think the main issue I'm having is that they're both adjectives and shouldn't directly lead to each other like I said before.
particular
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
At any rate, for the sake of keeping this moving, I will accept particular.
Existence
I'm not sure how this thread will ever end...
I'm used to cause and effect.... not cause, effect, and back to cause.
(e.g. AB -> A + B compared to AB -> A + B -> C ... where C would be another reactant not directly related to A and B other than it being another subject/noun/group/adjective...)